Physical implications of the subthreshold GRB GBM-190816 and its associated subthreshold gravitational-wave event.
YANG Y.-S., ZHONG S.-Q., ZHANG B.-B., WU S., ZHANG B., YANG Y.-H., CAO Z., GAO H., ZOU J.-H., WANG J.-S., LU H.-J., CANG J.-R. and DAI Z.-G.
Abstract (from CDS):
The LIGO/Virgo and Fermi collaborations recently reported a possible joint detection of a subthreshold gravitational-wave (GW) event and a subthreshold gamma-ray burst (GRB), GBM-190816, that occurred 1.57 s after the merger. We perform an independent analysis of the publicly available data and investigate the physical implications of this potential association. By carefully studying the following properties of GBM-190816 using Fermi/GBM data, including signal-to-noise ratio, duration, f-parameter, spectral properties, energetic properties, and its compliance with some GRB statistical correlations, we confirm that this event is likely a typical short GRB. Assuming its association with the subthreshold GW event, the inferred luminosity is 1.47–1.04+3.40×1049 erg s–1. Based on the available information of the subthreshold GW event, we infer the mass ratio q of the compact binary as q=2.26–1.43+2.75 (90% confidence interval) according to the reported range of luminosity distance. If the heavier compact object has a mass >3 solar masses, q can be further constrained to q=2.26–0.12+2.75. The leading physical scenario invokes an NS-BH merger system with the NS tidally disrupted. Within this scenario, we constrain the physical properties of such a system (including mass ratio q, the spin parameters, and the observer's viewing angle) to produce a GRB. The GW data may also allow an NS-BH system with no tidal disruption of the NS (the plunge events) or a BH-BH merger. We apply the charged compact binary coalescence theory (for both a constant charge and an increasing charge for the merging members) to derive the model parameters to account for GBM-190816 and found that the required parameters are extreme. Finally, we argue that the fact that the observed GW-GRB delay timescale is comparable to that of GW170817/GRB 170817A suggests that the GW-GRB time delay of these two cases is mainly defined by the timescale for the jet to propagate to the energy dissipation/GRB emission site.
To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2020ApJ...899...60Y and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu