2020PASP..132i4502P -
Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac., 132, part no 9, 4502-94502 (2020/September-0)
Detection of radio pulsars in single-pulse searches within and across surveys.
PANG D., GOSEVA-POPSTOJANOVA K. and McLAUGHLIN M.
Abstract (from CDS):
Pulsar detection using machine learning is a challenging problem as it involves extreme class imbalance and strong prioritization of high Recall. This paper is focused on automatic detection of astrophysical pulses in single-pulse searches, both within and across surveys. We use the output from the first stage of our previously developed two-stage Single-Pulse Event Group IDentification approach and focus on the second stage (i.e., classification of pulse candidates). Specifically, for the first time in time-domain single-pulse searches we (1) use boosting and deep learning algorithms for within-survey classification and (2) investigate cross-survey classification by using two transfer learning methods, trAdaBoost (instance-based) and fine-tuning (parameter-based). Our experimental results are based on two benchmark data sets, Green Bank Telescope Drift-scan (GBTDrift) and Pulsar Arecibo L-band Feed Array (PALFA)-extended, created from the GBTDrift survey and the PALFA survey. The main findings include: (1) Due to the emphasis on high Recall, F4 measure is more appropriate performance indicator than the balanced F1 measure. (2) For the GBTDrift benchmark, AdaBoost outperformed the other models with 98.5% Recall and F4 = 0.942. For the PALFA-extended benchmark, RandomForest performed the best, with 91.6% Recall and F4 = 0.890. (3) Models performance degraded significantly when they were used for pulsar classification across surveys. (4) Transfer learning improved cross-survey classification significantly when training data in the target data set were limited. When the GBTDrift benchmark was used as the target data set, fine-tuned SPEGnet models had the highest F4 measure, while trAdaBoost models had the highest F4 measure when PALFA-extended benchmark was used as the target data set. (5) Pulse classification was affected not only by the between-class imbalance (i.e., pulsar versus non-pulsar), but also by the within-class imbalance, which was more prominent in the case of the PALFA-extended benchmark due to the lack of labeled low signal-to-noise ratio pulsars.
References (23 between 1850 and 2026) (Total 23)
Simbad bibliographic survey began in 1850 for stars (at least bright stars) and in 1983 for all other objects (outside the solar system).
Follow
new references on this object
Annotations :
Annotations allow a user to add a note or report an error concerning the astronomical object and its data. It requires registration to post a note. See description . Please, have a look at Best practices. The list of all annotations to SIMBAD objects can be found here .
The annotation server is currently not available. Sorry for any inconvenience
To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2020PASP..132i4502P and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu