2021A&A...645A..54K


Query : 2021A&A...645A..54K

2021A&A...645A..54K - Astronomy and Astrophysics, volume 645A54-54 (2021/1-1)

It has to be cool: Supergiant progenitors of binary black hole mergers from common-envelope evolution.

KLENCKI J., NELEMANS G., ISTRATE A.G. and CHRUSLINSKA M.

Abstract (from CDS):

Common-envelope (CE) evolution in massive binary systems is thought to be one of the most promising channels for the formation of compact binary mergers. In the case of merging binary black holes (BBHs), the essential CE phase takes place at a stage when the first BH is already formed and the companion star expands as a supergiant. We aim to decipher the kinds of BH binaries with supergiant companions that could potentially evolve through and survive a CE phase. To this end, we compute envelope binding energies from detailed massive stellar models at different evolutionary stages and metallicities. We make multiple physically extreme choices of assumptions that favor easier CE ejection as well as account for recent advancements in mass-transfer stability criteria. We find that even with the most optimistic assumptions, a successful CE ejection in BH binaries is only possible if the donor is a massive convective-envelope giant, namely a red supergiant (RSG). The same is true for neutron-star binaries with massive companions. In other words, pre-CE progenitors of BBH mergers are BH binaries with RSG companions. We find that because of its influence on the radial expansion of massive giants, metallicity has an indirect but a very strong effect on the chemical profile, density structure, and the binding energies of RSG envelopes. Our results suggest that merger rates from population-synthesis models could be severely overestimated, especially at low metallicity. Additionally, the lack of observed RSGs with luminosities above log(L/L☉)≃5.6-5.8, corresponding to stars with M≥40M☉, puts into question the viability of the CE channel for the formation of the most massive BBH mergers. Either such RSGs elude detection due to very short lifetimes, or they do not exist and the CE channel can only produce BBH systems with total mass ≤50M☉. Finally, we discuss an alternative CE scenario in which a partial envelope ejection is followed by a phase of possibly long and stable mass transfer.

Abstract Copyright: © ESO 2021

Journal keyword(s): stars: evolution - binaries: close - stars: black holes - gravitational waves - supergiants

Simbad objects: 17

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 17
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2026
#notes
1 [BWF97] IC 10 X-1 HXB 00 20 29.03310480 +59 16 51.7609560           ~ 180 0
2 M 31 AGN 00 42 44.330 +41 16 07.50 4.86 4.36 3.44     ~ 13622 1
3 NAME SMC G 00 52 38.0 -72 48 01   2.79 2.2     ~ 12317 1
4 NAME NGC 300 2010da s*b 00 55 04.86 -37 41 43.7           LBV 189 0
5 CXOU J005510.0-374212 HXB 00 55 09.990 -37 42 12.16     22.44     WNE 139 1
6 GrW 190814 GWE 00 55.8 -27 05           ~ 433 0
7 NAME LMC G 05 23 34.6 -69 45 22     0.4     ~ 19090 0
8 AT 2011kp ev 12 30 41.85 +41 37 49.8           ~ 45 0
9 NAME M101 OT2015-1 SN? 14 02 16.78 +54 26 20.5   19.19 17.57 16.92 16.26 ~ 51 0
10 AT 2014ib SN? 14 59 59.47 +01 54 26.6           ~ 43 1
11 SS 433 HXB 19 11 49.5647697480 +04 58 57.827127648   16.854 14.643     A7Ib 2253 4
12 V* V1521 Cyg HXB 20 32 25.78 +40 57 27.9           WN4/5-6/7 2035 2
13 V* V1341 Cyg LXB 21 44 41.1544345272 +38 19 17.066570988 15.00 15.13 14.68 15.00   A9III 1229 1
14 GrW 151226 GWE ~ ~           ~ 275 1
15 GrW 150914 GWE ~ ~           ~ 674 1
16 GrW 190412 GWE ~ ~           ~ 169 0
17 GrW 190521 GWE ~ ~           ~ 409 0

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2021A&A...645A..54K and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu