2022A&A...668A..16S


Query : 2022A&A...668A..16S

2022A&A...668A..16S - Astronomy and Astrophysics, volume 668A16 (2022/12-1)

The Gaia-ESO Survey: Chemical tagging in the thin disk Open clusters blindly recovered in the elemental abundance space.

SPINA L., MAGRINI L., SACCO G.G., CASALI G., VALLENARI A., TAUTVAISIENE G., JIMENEZ-ESTEBAN F., GILMORE G., RANDICH S., FELTZING S., JEFFRIES R.D., BENSBY T., BRAGAGLIA A., SMILJANIC R., CARRARO G., MORBIDELLI L. and ZAGGIA S.

Abstract (from CDS):

Context. The chemical makeup of a star provides the fossil information of the environment where it formed. Under this premise, it should be possible to use chemical abundances to tag stars that formed within the same stellar association. This idea - known as chemical tagging - has not produced the expected results, especially within the thin disk where open stellar clusters have chemical patterns that are difficult to disentangle. Aims. The ultimate goal of this study is to probe the feasibility of chemical tagging within the thin disk population using high-quality data from a controlled sample of stars. We also aim at improving the existing techniques of chemical tagging and giving some kind of guidance on different strategies of clustering analysis in the elemental abundance space. Methods. Here we develop the first blind search of open clusters' members through clustering analysis in the elemental abundance space using the OPTICS algorithm applied to data from the Gaia-ESO survey. First, we evaluate different strategies of analysis (e.g., choice of the algorithm, data preprocessing techniques, metric, space of data clustering), determining which ones are more performing. Second, we apply these methods to a data set including both field stars and open clusters attempting a blind recover of as many open clusters as possible. Results. We show how specific strategies of data analysis can improve the final results. Specifically, we demonstrate that open clusters can be more efficaciously recovered with the Manhattan metric and on a space whose dimensions are carefully selected. Using these (and other) prescriptions we are able to recover open clusters hidden in our data set and find new members of these stellar associations (i.e., escapers, binaries). Conclusions. Our results indicate that there are chances of recovering open clusters' members via clustering analysis in the elemental abundance space, albeit in a data set that has a very high fraction of cluster members compared to an average field star sample. Presumably, the performances of chemical tagging will further increase with higher quality data and more sophisticated clustering algorithms, which will likely became available in the near future.

Abstract Copyright: © ESO 2022

Journal keyword(s): astrochemistry - methods: statistical - stars: abundances - Galaxy: abundances - Galaxy: disk

Simbad objects: 37

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 37
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2026
#notes
1 Cl Berkeley 21 OpC 05 51 44.7 +21 48 36   12.26 11.1     ~ 130 0
2 Cl Czernik 24 OpC 05 55 23.6 +20 52 27           ~ 46 0
3 NGC 2141 OpC 06 02 56.5 +10 26 57           ~ 159 0
4 NGC 2158 OpC 06 07 26.7 +24 05 53           ~ 317 0
5 NGC 2243 OpC 06 29 34.3 -31 16 58   10.12 9.4     ~ 298 0
6 Cl Trumpler 5 OpC 06 36 31.8 +09 28 03           ~ 146 0
7 Cl Ruprecht 4 OpC 06 48 57.7 -10 31 24           ~ 51 0
8 Cl Berkeley 31 OpC 06 57 37.5 +08 17 18           ~ 142 0
9 Cl Berkeley 32 OpC 06 58 06.7 +06 25 53           ~ 164 0
10 NGC 2324 OpC 07 04 08.5 +01 02 50   8.83 8.4     ~ 174 0
11 NGC 2353 OpC 07 14 34.0 -10 15 11   7.30 7.1     ~ 114 0
12 NGC 2355 OpC 07 16 59.1 +13 46 09     9.7     ~ 127 0
13 Cl Haffner 10 OpC 07 28 37.4 -15 21 42   12.60 11.5     ~ 52 0
14 Cl Melotte 71 OpC 07 37 31.3 -12 03 42   7.44 7.1     ~ 149 0
15 NGC 2425 OpC 07 38 18.4 -14 53 32           ~ 64 0
16 NGC 2420 OpC 07 38 24.6 +21 34 26   9.0 8.3     ~ 523 0
17 Cl Berkeley 39 OpC 07 46 48.1 -04 39 59           ~ 209 1
18 NGC 2477 OpC 07 52 11.4 -38 32 47   6.64 5.8     ~ 314 0
19 NGC 2660 OpC 08 42 40.0 -47 11 59   9.05 8.8     ~ 164 0
20 NGC 2682 OpC 08 51 23.5 +11 48 54           ~ 2528 0
21 Cl Pismis 15 OpC 09 34 44.7 -48 02 36           ~ 45 0
22 NGC 3960 OpC 11 50 36.4 -55 40 40   9.07 8.3     ~ 152 0
23 NGC 4337 OpC 12 24 04.8 -58 07 28   9.44 8.9     ~ 66 0
24 Cl Collinder 261 OpC 12 38 04.7 -68 22 40     10.7     ~ 216 0
25 Cl Trumpler 20 OpC 12 39 33.0 -60 38 10           ~ 138 0
26 M 5 GlC 15 18 33.22 +02 04 51.7     5.95     ~ 2095 0
27 NGC 6005 OpC 15 55 49.2 -57 26 23   11.90 10.7     ~ 72 0
28 Cl Trumpler 23 OpC 16 00 51.6 -53 32 20     11.2     ~ 63 0
29 M 13 GlC 16 41 41.634 +36 27 40.75     5.8     ~ 2291 0
30 NGC 6253 OpC 16 59 06.4 -52 42 39     10.2     ~ 209 0
31 NGC 6281 OpC 17 04 44.6 -37 57 08           ~ 156 0
32 Cl Ruprecht 134 OpC 17 52 44.9 -29 31 48           ~ 56 0
33 [TGB2011] J181015.5026-314707.581 * 18 10 15.5042227704 -31 47 07.554447096     12.7     ~ 6 0
34 TYC 7396-1811-1 * 18 16 11.8175881344 -33 39 16.117454664   12.69 11.91     ~ 4 0
35 NGC 6633 OpC 18 27 30.2 +06 38 21           ~ 423 0
36 Cl Berkeley 81 OpC 19 01 39.4 -00 27 10           ~ 93 0
37 NGC 6802 OpC 19 30 36.3 +20 15 42   10.07 8.8     ~ 115 0

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2022A&A...668A..16S and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu