2023A&A...669A..94S


Query : 2023A&A...669A..94S

2023A&A...669A..94S - Astronomy and Astrophysics, volume 669A94 (2023/1-1)

How much metal did the first stars provide to the ultra-faint dwarfs?

SANATI M., JEANQUARTIER F., REVAZ Y. and JABLONKA P.

Abstract (from CDS):

Numerical simulations of dwarf galaxies have so far failed to reproduce the observed metallicity-luminosity relation, down to the regime of ultra-faint dwarfs (UFDs). We address this issue by exploring how the first generations of metal-free stars (Pop III) could help increase the mean metallicity ([Fe/H]) of those small and faint galaxies. We ran zoom-in chemo-dynamical simulations of 19 halos extracted from a Λ Cold Dark Matter (CDM) cosmological box and followed their evolution down to redshift z = 0. Models were validated not only on the basis of galaxy global properties, but also on the detailed investigation of the stellar abundance ratios ([α/Fe]). We identified the necessary conditions for the formation of the first stars in mini-halos and derived constraints on the metal ejection schemes. The impact of Pop III stars on the final metallicity of UFDs was evaluated by considering different stellar mass ranges for their initial mass function (IMF), the influence of pair-instability supernovae (PISNe), and their energetic feedback, as well as the metallicity threshold that marks the transition from the first massive stars to the formation of low-mass long-lived stars. The inclusion of Pop III stars with masses below 140 M⊙, and a standard IMF slope of -1.3 does increase the global metallicity of UFDs, although these are insufficient to resolve the tension with observations. The PISNe with progenitor masses above 140 M⊙ do allow the metal content of UFDs to further increase. However, as PISNe are very rare and sometimes absent in the faintest UFDs, they have a limited impact on the global faint end of the metallicity-luminosity relation. Despite a limited number of spectroscopically confirmed members in UFDs, which make the stellar metallicity distribution of some UFDs uncertain, our analysis reveals that this is essentially the metal-rich tail that is missing in the models. The remaining challenges are thus both observational and numerical: (i) to extend high-resolution spectroscopy data samples and confirm the mean metallicity of the faintest UFDs; and (ii) to explain the presence of chemically enriched stars in galaxies with very short star formation histories.

Abstract Copyright: © The Authors 2023

Journal keyword(s): galaxies: dwarf - stars: Population III - Galaxy: abundances - methods: numerical

Simbad objects: 16

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 16
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2026
#notes
1 NAME Tri II G 02 13 17.40 +36 10 42.4           ~ 164 0
2 NAME Segue 2 G 02 19 16.0 +20 10 31     15.2     ~ 299 0
3 NAME Hor I G 02 55 31.7 -54 07 08           ~ 169 0
4 NAME Reticulum II G 03 35 42.1 -54 02 57           ~ 375 0
5 NAME UMa II Galaxy G 08 51 30.0 +63 07 48     13.3     ~ 410 0
6 NAME Segue 1 G 10 07 03.2 +16 04 25     15.3     ~ 517 1
7 NAME Sextans dSph LSB 10 13 02.9 -01 36 53   12 10.4     ~ 921 0
8 NAME Leo IV LSB 11 32 57.0 -00 32 00     15.1     ~ 419 1
9 NAME CVn II dSph G 12 57 09.6 +34 19 12     16.1     ~ 287 2
10 NAME Bootes II G 13 58 00.0 +12 51 00     15.4     ~ 269 0
11 NAME Bootes Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxy G 14 00 00.0 +14 30 00     12.8     ~ 491 0
12 NAME Hercules Dwarf Galaxy G 16 31 02.0 +12 47 30     14.0     ~ 379 1
13 NAME Tuc II G 22 51 55.1 -58 34 08           ~ 192 0
14 NAME Grus I G 22 56 42.4 -50 09 48           ~ 126 0
15 NAME Tuc III G 23 56.6 -59 36           ~ 229 0
16 NAME Local Group GrG ~ ~           ~ 9325 0

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2023A&A...669A..94S and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu