2023A&A...672A..11E


Query : 2023A&A...672A..11E

2023A&A...672A..11E - Astronomy and Astrophysics, volume 672A11 (2023/4-1)

Lyman continuum leaker candidates among highly ionised, low-redshift dwarf galaxies selected from He II.

ENDERS A.U., BOMANS D.J. and WITTJE A.

Abstract (from CDS):

Context. Contemporary research suggests that the reionisation of the intergalactic medium (IGM) in the early Universe was predominantly realised by star-forming (proto-)galaxies (SFGs). Due to observational constraints, our knowledge on the origins of sufficient amounts of ionising Lyman continuum (LyC) photons and the mechanisms facilitating their transport into the IGM remains sparse. Recent efforts have thus focussed on the study of local analogues to these high-redshift objects.
Aims. We aim to acquire a set of very low-redshift SFGs that exhibit signs of a hard radiation field being present. A subsequent analysis of their emission line properties is intended to shed light on how the conditions prevalent in these objects compare to those predicted to be present in early SFGs that are thought to be LyC emitters (LCEs).
Methods. We used archival spectroscopic SDSS DR12 data to select a sample of low-redshift He II 4686 emitters and restricted it to a set of SFGs with an emission line diagnostic sensitive to the presence of an active galactic nucleus, which serves as our only selection criterion. We performed a population spectral synthesis with FADO to reconstruct these galaxies' star-formation histories (SFHs). Utilising the spectroscopic information at hand, we constrained the predominant ionisation mechanisms in these galaxies and inferred information on interstellar medium (ISM) conditions relevant for the escape of LyC radiation.
Results. Our final sample consists of eighteen ionised, metal-poor galaxies (IMPs). These low-mass (6.2 ≤ log(M⋆/M⊙) ≤ 8.8), low-metallicity (7.54 ≤ log(O/H) + 12 ≤ 8.13) dwarf galaxies appear to be predominantly ionised by stellar sources. We find large [OIII] 5007/[OII] 3727 ratios and [SII] 6717,6731/Hα deficiencies, which provide strong indications for these galaxies to be LCEs. At least 40% of these objects are candidates for featuring cosmologically significant LyC escape fractions ≳10%. The IMPs' SFHs exhibit strong similarities and almost all galaxies appear to contain an old (> 1 Gyr) stellar component, while also harbouring a young, two-stage (∼10 Myr and < 1 Myr) starburst, which we speculate might be related to LyC escape.
Conclusions. The properties of the compact emission line galaxies presented here align well with those observed in many local LCEs. In fact, our sample may prove as an extension to the rather small catalogue of local LCEs, as the extreme ISM conditions we find are assumed to facilitate LyC leakage. Notably, all of our eighteen candidates are significantly closer (z < 0.1) than most established LCEs. If the inferred LyC photon loss is genuine, this demonstrates that selecting SFGs from He II 4686 is a powerful selection criterion in the search for LCEs.

Abstract Copyright: © The Authors 2023

Journal keyword(s): galaxies: abundances - galaxies: dwarf - galaxies: fundamental parameters - galaxies: ISM - galaxies: starburst - dark ages, reionization, first stars

Simbad objects: 33

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 33
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2026
#notes
1 SDSS J000606.52+025504.1 G 00 06 06.52091 +02 55 04.1370           ~ 1 0
2 SDSS J002833.54+303554.1 G 00 28 33.54576 +30 35 54.1212           ~ 1 0
3 ESO 350-38 Sy2 00 36 52.489 -33 33 17.23   14.31 14.41 13.49   ~ 450 0
4 NAME SMC G 00 52 38.0 -72 48 01   2.79 2.2     ~ 12317 1
5 SDSS J013138.15+021014.5 G 01 31 38.16370 +02 10 14.6106           ~ 1 0
6 SDSS J013827.65+111434.4 EmG 01 38 27.65483 +11 14 34.4680           ~ 2 0
7 SDSS J015046.24+164326.4 G 01 50 46.24848 +16 43 26.4360           ~ 1 0
8 SDSS J022552.89+003335.3 G 02 25 52.89324 +00 33 35.3333           ~ 1 0
9 NGC 1569 rG 04 30 49.186 +64 50 52.52 11.72 11.86 11.03     ~ 1297 3
10 NAME LMC G 05 23 34.6 -69 45 22     0.4     ~ 19090 0
11 NGC 2363A HII 07 28 42.8 +69 11 21           ~ 588 3
12 NGC 2366 H2G 07 28 52.4529 +69 12 38.859 12.25 11.86 11.39 11.33   ~ 801 0
13 SDSS J074452.39+185830.0 G 07 44 52.39563 +18 58 30.0057           ~ 2 0
14 SDSS J075325.25+282012.7 G 07 53 25.2591734352 +28 20 12.437108988           ~ 2 0
15 SDSS J080942.74+491821.1 EmG 08 09 42.74207 +49 18 21.1180           ~ 2 0
16 SDSS J103728.60+232529.8 AG? 10 37 28.60824 +23 25 29.8128           ~ 4 0
17 SDSS J110920.88+342902.9 G 11 09 20.88726 +34 29 02.9592           ~ 1 0
18 SDSS J114146.74+605943.1 AG? 11 41 46.74048 +60 59 43.1340           ~ 2 0
19 SDSS J115248.53+400527.0 QSO 11 52 48.539 +40 05 27.09           ~ 2 0
20 EC 12476-2317 AGN 12 50 18.90 -23 33 57.6   16.29 15.46     ~ 72 0
21 Z 189-2 GiC 12 56 55.638 +32 26 51.50   15.1       ~ 90 0
22 SDSS J131135.81+375058.7 EmG 13 11 35.82209 +37 50 58.7347   19.23       ~ 3 0
23 SDSS J131331.26+604454.2 G 13 13 31.26456 +60 44 54.2354           ~ 1 0
24 SDSS J133842.15+421338.2 G 13 38 42.15984 +42 13 38.2044           ~ 3 0
25 NGC 5253 rG 13 39 55.990 -31 38 24.11 11.48 10.94 10.49 10.33 13.47 ~ 1421 4
26 SDSS J141113.40+055035.0 G 14 11 13.40594 +05 50 35.0550           ~ 1 0
27 SDSS J151441.65+284014.8 G 15 14 41.65704 +28 40 14.8296           ~ 1 0
28 SDSS J152826.52+231843.1 EmG 15 28 26.52914 +23 18 43.1063           ~ 2 0
29 SDSS J155647.50+181825.5 G 15 56 47.50896 +18 18 25.5744           ~ 1 0
30 SDSS J160801.15+041323.8 G 16 08 01.15680 +04 13 23.8548           ~ 1 0
31 SDSS J165732.76+413434.9 G 16 57 32.7700200384 +41 34 35.216644980           ~ 6 0
32 Z 225-15 GiC 16 57 33.53112 +41 35 18.7544   15.4       ~ 8 0
33 ESO 338-4 EmG 19 27 58.338 -41 34 30.81   13.55 13.21 13.14 13.43 ~ 253 1

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2023A&A...672A..11E and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu