2023A&A...676A..31D


Query : 2023A&A...676A..31D

2023A&A...676A..31D - Astronomy and Astrophysics, volume 676A31 (2023/8-1)

Failed supernovae as a natural explanation for the binary black hole mass distribution.

DISBERG P. and NELEMANS G.

Abstract (from CDS):

Context. As the number of detected gravitational wave sources increases, the better we can understand the mass distribution of binary black holes (BBHs). This “stellar graveyard” shows several features, including an apparent mass gap that makes the distribution bimodal. In turn, the observed chirp mass distribution appears to be trimodal.
Aims. We aim to investigate the extent to which we can explain the observed mass distribution based on stellar evolution, specifically with the hypothesis that the mass gap is caused by the difference between successful and failed supernovae (SNe).
Methods. We posed a hypothetical remnant function, based on the literature of stellar evolution simulations, which relates initial mass to remnant mass, while including a “black hole island” and producing a bimodal remnant distribution. Moreover, we looked at observed type II SN rates in an attempt to detect the effect of failed SNe. Finally, using a simplified estimation of binary evolution, we determined the remnant distribution resulting from our remnant function and compared it with observations.
Results. We find that failed SNe lower type II SN rates by approximately 25%, but the inferred rate from SN surveys is not accurate enough to confirm this. Furthermore, our estimation based on the remnant function produces a mass distribution that matches the general shape of the observed distributions of individual as well as chirp masses.
Conclusions. Based on our research, we conclude that the failed SN mechanism and the presence of the black hole island are a natural hypothesis for explaining the individual BBH mass distribution and chirp mass distribution. However, to obtain a firmer conclusion, more detailed simulations are needed.

Abstract Copyright: © The Authors 2023

Journal keyword(s): gravitational waves - gravitational lensing: strong - supernovae: general

Simbad objects: 1

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 1
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2026
#notes
1 GrW 190814 GWE 00 55.8 -27 05           ~ 433 0

Query : 2023A&A...676A..31D

Basic data :
GrW 190814 -- Gravitational Wave Event
Other object types:
otypes_help
GWE (2020A&A,GrW)
ICRS coord. (ep=J2000) :
00 55 48.0 -27 04 48 [ ] E 2021ApJ...910....4A
FK4 coord. (ep=B1950 eq=1950) :
00 53 22.3 -27 21 02 [ ]
Gal coord. (ep=J2000) :
210.3349 -89.0280 [ ]
SIMBAD within arcmin
Overlay Simbad points in this preview
Back
All CDSPortal (CDSPortal)

Send to sendBySAMP sendBySAMP

sedIcon
within arcsec sed-help-icon

Identifiers (2) :
An access of full data is available using the icon Vizier near the identifier of the catalogue

GrW 190814 GrW 190814 211039

References (433 between 1850 and 2026) (Total 433)
Simbad bibliographic survey began in 1850 for stars (at least bright stars) and in 1983 for all other objects (outside the solar system).
Follow new references on this object
                Reference summaries :

                from: to:

                 or select by : (not exhaustive, explanation here)


Annotations :
Annotations allow a user to add a note or report an error concerning the astronomical object and its data. It requires registration to post a note. See description .
Please, have a look at Best practices. The list of all annotations to SIMBAD objects can be found here .

The annotation server is currently not available. Sorry for any inconvenience


To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2023A&A...676A..31D and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu