2023A&A...678A.153E


Query : 2023A&A...678A.153E

2023A&A...678A.153E - Astronomy and Astrophysics, volume 678A153 (2023/10-1)

Quantifying the energy balance between the turbulent ionised gas and young stars.

EGOROV O.V., KRECKEL K., GLOVER S.C.O., GROVES B., BELFIORE F., EMSELLEM E., KLESSEN R.S., LEROY A.K., MEIDT S.E., SARBADHICARY S.K., SCHINNERER E., WATKINS E.J., WHITMORE B.C., BARNES A.T., CONGIU E., DALE D.A., GRASHA K., LARSON K.L., LEE J.C., MENDEZ-DELGADO J.E., THILKER D.A. and WILLIAMS T.G.

Abstract (from CDS):

Context. Stellar feedback is a key contributor to the morphology and dynamics of the interstellar medium in star-forming galaxies. In particular, energy and momentum input from massive stars can drive the turbulent motions in the gas, but the dominance and efficiency of this process are unclear. The study of ionised superbubbles enables quantitative constraints to be placed on the energetics of stellar feedback.
Aims. We directly compare the kinetic energy of expanding superbubbles and the turbulent motions in the interstellar medium with the mechanical energy deposited by massive stars in the form of winds and supernovae. With such a comparison, we aim to determine whether the stellar feedback is responsible for the observed turbulent motions and to quantify the fraction of mechanical energy retained in the superbubbles.
Methods. We investigated the ionised gas morphology, excitation properties, and kinematics in 19 nearby star-forming galaxies from the PHANGS-MUSE survey. Based on the distribution of the flux and velocity dispersion in the Hα line, we selected 1484 regions of locally elevated velocity dispersion (σ(Hα) > 45 km s–1), including at least 171 expanding superbubbles. We analysed these regions and related their properties to those of the young stellar associations and star clusters identified in PHANGS-HST data.
Results. We find a good correlation between the kinetic energy of the ionised gas and the total mechanical energy input from supernovae and stellar winds from the stellar associations. At the same time, the contribution of mechanical energy injected by the supernovae alone is not sufficient to explain the measured kinetic energy of the ionised gas, which implies that pre-supernova feedback in the form of radiation and thermal pressure as well as winds is necessary. We find that the gas kinetic energy decreases with metallicity for our sample covering Z = 0.5 - 1.0 Z⊙, reflecting the lower impact of stellar feedback. For the sample of well-resolved superbubbles, we find that about 40% of the young stellar associations are preferentially located in their rims. We also find a slightly higher (by ∼15%) fraction of the youngest (< 3 Myr) stellar associations in the rims of the superbubbles than in the centres and the opposite trend for older associations, which implies possible propagation or triggering of star formation.
Conclusions. Stellar feedback is the dominant source for powering the ionised gas in regions of locally (on a 50-500 pc scale) elevated velocity dispersion, with a typical coupling efficiency of 10 - 20%. Accounting for pre-supernovae feedback is required to set up the energy balance between gas and stars.

Abstract Copyright: © The Authors 2023

Journal keyword(s): galaxies: ISM - ISM: kinematics and dynamics - ISM: bubbles - galaxies: star formation

Simbad objects: 22

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 22
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2026
#notes
1 M 74 G 01 36 41.7451236624 +15 47 01.107512304 10.52 10.00 9.46 9.16   ~ 1934 1
2 NGC 1087 H2G 02 46 25.1550134904 -00 29 55.457857644   11.5   11.4 11.5 ~ 379 0
3 NGC 1300 Sy2 03 19 41.0462219928 -19 24 40.187565432   11.16 10.42 9.90 10.7 ~ 616 0
4 NGC 1365 Sy1 03 33 36.458 -36 08 26.37 10.48 10.08 9.63 8.79 9.7 ~ 1987 2
5 NGC 1385 EmG 03 37 28.323 -24 30 04.60 11.28 11.50 10.94 10.45 11.7 ~ 318 2
6 NGC 1433 Sy2 03 42 01.4847418992 -47 13 18.929092656   10.84 9.99 9.61 10.2 ~ 447 0
7 NGC 1512 GiP 04 03 54.281 -43 20 55.86 11.30 11.43 10.54 10.37   ~ 457 1
8 NGC 1566 Sy1 04 20 00.3968473248 -54 56 16.624708764 10.29 10.19 9.73 9.21 10.1 ~ 1051 2
9 NGC 1672 SyG 04 45 42.552 -59 14 50.68 10.29 10.53 9.68 9.53 10.2 ~ 461 2
10 NAME LMC G 05 23 34.6 -69 45 22     0.4     ~ 19090 0
11 Z 311-8 GiG 08 34 07.20 +66 10 54.0 15.39 15.03 14.70 14.49   ~ 357 2
12 NGC 2835 EmG 09 17 52.8523921416 -22 21 16.839119700   11.03   10.32 10.9 ~ 285 0
13 MCG-01-26-030 H2G 10 11 00.5 -04 41 30 12.48 12.13 11.93 11.78   ~ 789 2
14 M 95 GiP 10 43 57.7313485800 +11 42 13.301191332 10.71 10.51 9.73 9.48   ~ 1238 2
15 M 66 AGN 11 20 15.0 +12 59 29 9.85 9.65 8.92     ~ 1509 4
16 M 99 H2G 12 18 49.625 +14 24 59.36 10.45 10.44 9.87     ~ 1004 2
17 M 61 Sy2 12 21 54.9282582888 +04 28 25.597367184 10.07 10.18 9.65     ~ 1084 1
18 M 100 AGN 12 22 54.9299993592 +15 49 20.296257960 10.04 10.05 9.35     ~ 1963 2
19 NGC 4535 H2G 12 34 20.3443516704 +08 11 51.908488116   11.1       ~ 679 0
20 NGC 5068 AG? 13 18 54.807 -21 02 20.76 11.24 10.53 10.01 9.78 10.1 ~ 354 0
21 NGC 7496 Sy2 23 09 47.2876854912 -43 25 40.279652796   11.92 13.90 10.95 11.5 ~ 350 1
22 IC 5332 GiG 23 34 27.488 -36 06 03.89 11.59 11.27 10.72 10.50 11.2 ~ 216 0

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2023A&A...678A.153E and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu