2023MNRAS.519..384E


Query : 2023MNRAS.519..384E

2023MNRAS.519..384E - Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 519, 384-396 (2023/February-2)

Dark matter halo cores and the tidal survival of Milky Way satellites.

ERRANI R., NAVARRO J.F., PENARRUBIA J., FAMAEY B. and IBATA R.

Abstract (from CDS):

The cuspy central density profiles of cold dark matter (CDM) haloes make them highly resilient to disruption by tides. Self-interactions between dark matter particles, or the cycling of baryons, may result in the formation of a constant-density core that would make haloes more susceptible to tidal disruption. We use N-body simulations to study the evolution of Navarro-Frenk-White (NFW)-like 'cored' subhaloes in the tidal field of a massive host, and identify the criteria and time-scales for full disruption. Our results imply that the survival of Milky Way satellites places constraints on the sizes of dark matter cores. We find that no subhaloes with cores larger than 1 per cent of their initial NFW scale radius can survive for a Hubble time on orbits with pericentres ${\lesssim} 10\, \mathrm{kpc}$. A satellite like Tucana 3, with pericentre ${\sim} 3.5\, \mathrm{kpc}$, must have a core size smaller than ${\sim} 2\, \mathrm{pc}$ to survive just three orbital periods on its current orbit. The core sizes expected in self-interacting dark matter models with a velocity-independent cross-section of $1\, \mathrm{cm^2}\,\mathrm{g}^{-1}$ seem incompatible with ultrafaint satellites with small pericentric radii, such as Tuc 3, Seg 1, Seg 2, Ret 2, Tri 2, and Wil 1, as these should have fully disrupted if accreted on to the Milky Way ${\gtrsim} 10\, \mathrm{Gyr}$ ago. These results suggest that many satellites have vanishingly small core sizes, consistent with CDM cusps. The discovery of further Milky Way satellites on orbits with small pericentric radii would strengthen these conclusions and allow for stricter upper limits on the core sizes.

Abstract Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal Astronomical Society

Journal keyword(s): dark matter - Galaxy: kinematics and dynamics - galaxies: evolution - galaxies: dwarf

Simbad objects: 25

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 25
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2026
#notes
1 NAME Tuc IV G 00 02.9 -60 51           ~ 90 0
2 NAME Sculptor Dwarf Galaxy G 01 00 09.4 -33 42 32   9.79 8.6 8.81   ~ 1498 4
3 NAME Tri II G 02 13 17.40 +36 10 42.4           ~ 164 0
4 NAME Segue 2 G 02 19 16.0 +20 10 31     15.2     ~ 299 0
5 MCG-06-07-001 G 02 39 59.3 -34 26 57   9.02 7.4     ~ 1894 1
6 NAME Hor I G 02 55 31.7 -54 07 08           ~ 169 0
7 NAME Horologium II G 03 16 32.1 -50 01 05           ~ 76 0
8 NAME Reticulum II G 03 35 42.1 -54 02 57           ~ 375 0
9 NAME Reticulum III G 03 45.4 -60 27           ~ 67 0
10 NAME LMC G 05 23 34.6 -69 45 22     0.4     ~ 19090 0
11 NAME UMa II Galaxy G 08 51 30.0 +63 07 48     13.3     ~ 410 0
12 NAME Antlia II Dwarf Galaxy G 09 35 32.8 -36 46 02           ~ 109 0
13 NAME Segue 1 G 10 07 03.2 +16 04 25     15.3     ~ 517 1
14 NAME UMa I Galaxy G 10 34 52.80 +51 55 12.0     14.4     ~ 355 1
15 NAME Willman 1 G 10 49 21.0 +51 03 00     15.2     ~ 345 0
16 NAME Crater II Dwarf Galaxy G 11 49 14 -18 24.8           ~ 176 0
17 NAME Coma Dwarf Galaxy G 12 26 59.0 +23 54 15     14.1     ~ 482 1
18 NAME CVn II dSph G 12 57 09.6 +34 19 12     16.1     ~ 287 2
19 NAME CVn I dSph G 13 28 03.5 +33 33 21     13.1     ~ 352 1
20 Z 318-18 G 15 09 08.0 +67 13 21   13.60 10.6     ~ 1459 0
21 NAME Draco II Gl? 15 52 47.6 +64 33 55           ~ 138 0
22 NAME Sagittarius II Gl? 19 52 40.5 -22 04 05           ~ 97 0
23 NAME Tuc II G 22 51 55.1 -58 34 08           ~ 192 0
24 NAME Tuc V G 23 37.4 -63 16           ~ 84 0
25 NAME Tuc III G 23 56.6 -59 36           ~ 229 0

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2023MNRAS.519..384E and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu