2023MNRAS.520.5671H


Query : 2023MNRAS.520.5671H

2023MNRAS.520.5671H - Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 520, 5671-5711 (2023/April-3)

The chemical characterization of halo substructure in the Milky Way based on APOGEE.

HORTA D., SCHIAVON R.P., MACKERETH J.T., WEINBERG D.H., HASSELQUIST S., FEUILLET D., O'CONNELL R.W., ANGUIANO B., ALLENDE-PRIETO C., BEATON R.L., BIZYAEV D., CUNHA K., GEISLER D., GARCIA-HERNANDEZ D.A., HOLTZMAN J., JONSSON H., LANE R.R., MAJEWSKI S.R., MESZAROS S., MINNITI D., NITSCHELM C., SHETRONE M., SMITH V.V. and ZASOWSKI G.

Abstract (from CDS):

Galactic haloes in a Λ-CDM universe are predicted to host today a swarm of debris resulting from cannibalized dwarf galaxies. The chemodynamical information recorded in their stellar populations helps elucidate their nature, constraining the assembly history of the Galaxy. Using data from APOGEE and Gaia, we examine the chemical properties of various halo substructures, considering elements that sample various nucleosynthetic pathways. The systems studied are Heracles, Gaia-Enceladus/Sausage (GES), the Helmi stream, Sequoia, Thamnos, Aleph, LMS-1, Arjuna, I'itoi, Nyx, Icarus, and Pontus. Abundance patterns of all substructures are cross-compared in a statistically robust fashion. Our main findings include: (i) the chemical properties of most substructures studied match qualitatively those of dwarf Milky Way satellites, such as the Sagittarius dSph. Exceptions are Nyx and Aleph, which are chemically similar to disc stars, implying that these substructures were likely formed in situ; (ii) Heracles differs chemically from in situ populations such as Aurora and its inner halo counterparts in a statistically significant way. The differences suggest that the star formation rate was lower in Heracles than in the early Milky Way; (iii) the chemistry of Arjuna, LMS-1, and I'itoi is indistinguishable from that of GES, suggesting a possible common origin; (iv) all three Sequoia samples studied are qualitatively similar. However, only two of those samples present chemistry that is consistent with GES in a statistically significant fashion; (v) the abundance patterns of the Helmi stream and Thamnos are different from all other halo substructures.

Abstract Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal Astronomical Society

Journal keyword(s): Galaxy: abundances - Galaxy: evolution - Galaxy: formation - Galaxy: general - Galaxy: halo - Galaxy: kinematics and dynamics

Simbad objects: 21

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 21
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2026
#notes
1 NAME SMC G 00 52 38.0 -72 48 01   2.79 2.2     ~ 12317 1
2 NAME Cetus-Palca Stream St* 01 31 +01.0           ~ 97 1
3 NAME Sagittarius Stream St* 02 22 +00.0           ~ 1001 0
4 NAME Magellanic Clouds GrG 03 00 -71.0           ~ 7988 0
5 NAME LMC G 05 23 34.6 -69 45 22     0.4     ~ 19090 0
6 NAME Anticenter Stream St* 10 51 -50.9           ~ 35 1
7 NAME LMS-1 Stream St* 13 14.5 +17 56           ~ 63 0
8 NAME Sequoia Cluster GlC 17 31 12.0 -39 48 30           ~ 154 0
9 NAME Galactic Center reg 17 45 39.60213 -29 00 22.0000           ~ 16269 0
10 NAME Sgr A* X 17 45 40.03599 -29 00 28.1699           ~ 4970 3
11 NAME SDG G 18 55 19.0 -30 32 43   4.5 3.6     ~ 2438 2
12 NAME Thamnos Stream St* ~ ~           ~ 63 0
13 NAME Aleph Stream St* ~ ~           ~ 15 0
14 NAME Arjuna Stream St* ~ ~           ~ 27 0
15 NAME Gaia Enceladus-Sausage St* ~ ~           ~ 860 0
16 NAME I'itoi Stream St* ~ ~           ~ 29 0
17 NAME Helmi Stream St* ~ ~           ~ 144 0
18 NAME Icarus Stream St* ~ ~           ~ 9 0
19 NAME Nyx Stream St* ~ ~           ~ 15 0
20 NAME Pontus Stream St* ~ ~           ~ 21 0
21 NAME Heracles Stream St* ~ ~           ~ 48 0

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2023MNRAS.520.5671H and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu