2024A&A...689A.203P


Query : 2024A&A...689A.203P

2024A&A...689A.203P - Astronomy and Astrophysics, volume 689A203 (2024/9-1)

Cosmic Type Ia supernova rate and constraints on supernova Ia progenitors.

PALICIO P.A., MATTEUCCI F., DELLA VALLE M. and SPITONI E.

Abstract (from CDS):

Context. Type Ia supernovae play a key role in the evolution of galaxies by polluting the interstellar medium with a fraction of iron peak elements larger than that released in the core-collapse supernova events. Their light curve, moreover, is widely used in cosmological studies as it constitutes a reliable distance indicator on extragalactic scales. Among the mechanisms proposed to explain the Type Ia supernovae (SNe), the single- and double-degenerate channels are thought to be the dominant ones, which implies a different distribution of time delays between the progenitor formation and the explosion.
Aims. In this paper, we aim to determine the dominant mechanism by comparing a compilation of Type Ia SN rates with those computed from various cosmic star-formation histories coupled with different delay-time distribution functions. We also evaluate the relative contributions of both channels.
Methods. By using a least-squares fitting procedure, we modeled the observations of Type Ia SN rates assuming different combinations of three recent cosmic star-formation rates and seven delay-time distributions. The goodness of these fits are statistically quantified by the χ2 test.
Results. For two of the three cosmic star-formation rates, the single degenerate scenario provides the most accurate explanation for the observations, while a combination of 34% single-degenerate- and 66% double-degenerate delay-time distributions is more plausible for the remaining tested cosmic star-formation rates.
Conclusions. Though dependent on the assumed cosmic star-formation rate, we find arguments in favor of the single-degenerate model. From the theoretic point of view, at least ∼34% of the Type Ia SN must have been produced through the single-degenerate channel to account for the observations. The wide, double-degenerate mechanism slightly under-predicts the observations at redshift z ≳ 1, unless the cosmic SFR flattens in that regime. On the contrary, although the purely close double-degenerate scenario can be ruled out, we cannot rule out a mixed scenario with single- and double-degenerate progenitors.

Abstract Copyright: © The Authors 2024

Journal keyword(s): supernovae: general - galaxies: evolution - galaxies: high-redshift

Simbad objects: 6

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 6
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2026
#notes
1 M 31 AGN 00 42 44.330 +41 16 07.50 4.86 4.36 3.44     ~ 13622 1
2 RX J0045.4+4154 No* 00 45 28.80 +41 54 10.1           ~ 263 1
3 SN 2012Z SN* 03 22 05.39641 -15 23 14.9390           SNIax 142 1
4 SN 2011km SN* 08 09 12.87 +46 18 48.8           SNIa 155 0
5 SN 2011fe SN* 14 03 05.711 +54 16 25.22   10.12 10.06     SNIa-norm 747 1
6 M 101 GiP 14 03 12.583 +54 20 55.50   8.46 7.86 7.76   ~ 3138 2

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2024A&A...689A.203P and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu