2024ApJ...970..163S

Core-collapse supernovae (CCSNe) are the terminal explosions of massive stars. While most massive stars explode as iron-core-collapse supernovae (FeCCSNe), slightly less massive stars explode as electron-capture supernovae (ECSNe), shaping the low-mass end of CCSNe. ECSNe were proposed ∼40 yr ago and first-principles simulations also predict their successful explosions. Observational identification and investigation of ECSNe are important for the completion of stellar evolution theory. To date, only one promising candidate has been proposed, SN 2018zd, other than the historical progenitor of the Crab Nebula, SN 1054. We present representative synthetic light curves of low-mass FeCCSNe and ECSNe, i.e., with theoretically or observationally plausible explosion energies and distributions of circumstellar media (CSM). The ECSNe have shorter, brighter, and bluer plateaus than the FeCCSNe. To investigate the robustness of their intrinsic differences, we also calculated light curves of ECSNe and low-mass FeCCSNe adopting various explosion energies and CSM. Although they may have similar bolometric light-curve plateaus, ECSNe are bluer than FeCCSNe in the absence of strong CSM interaction, illustrating that multicolor observations are essential to identify ECSNe. This provides a robust indicator of ECSNe because the bluer plateaus stem from the low-density envelopes of their super-asymptotic-giant-branch progenitors. We propose a distance-independent method to identify ECSNe: ${\left(g-r\right)}_{{t}_{{\rm{PT}}}/2}\lt 0.008\times {t}_{{\rm{PT}}}-0.4$, i.e., blue g - r at the middle of the plateau ${(g-r)}_{{t}_{\mathrm{PT}}/2}$, where t_PT is the transition epoch from plateau to tail. Using this method, we identified SN 2018zd as an ECSN, which we believe to be the first ECSN identified with modern observing techniques.