2024ApJ...976L...8R


Query : 2024ApJ...976L...8R

2024ApJ...976L...8R - Astrophys. J., 976, L8 (2024/November-3)

CEERS Key Paper. IX. Identifying Galaxy Mergers in CEERS NIRCam Images Using Random Forests and Convolutional Neural Networks.

ROSE C., KARTALTEPE J.S., SNYDER G.F., HUERTAS-COMPANY M., YUNG L.Y.A., ARRABAL HARO P., BAGLEY M.B., BISIGELLO L., CALABRO A., CLERI N.J., DICKINSON M., FERGUSON H.C., FINKELSTEIN S.L., FONTANA A., GRAZIAN A., GROGIN N.A., HOLWERDA B.W., IYER K.G., KEWLEY L.J., KIRKPATRICK A., KOCEVSKI D.D., KOEKEMOER A.M., LOTZ J.M., LUCAS R.A., NAPOLITANO L., PAPOVICH C., PENTERICCI L., PEREZ-GONZALEZ P.G., PIRZKAL N., RAVINDRANATH S., SOMERVILLE R.S., STRAUGHN A.N., TRUMP J.R., WILKINS S.M. and YANG G.

Abstract (from CDS):

A crucial yet challenging task in galaxy evolution studies is the identification of distant merging galaxies, a task that suffers from a variety of issues ranging from telescope sensitivities and limitations to the inherently chaotic morphologies of young galaxies. In this paper, we use random forests and convolutional neural networks to identify high-redshift JWST Cosmic Evolution Early Release Science Survey (CEERS) galaxy mergers. We train these algorithms on simulated 3 < z < 5 CEERS galaxies created from the IllustrisTNG subhalo morphologies and the Santa Cruz SAM light cone. We apply our models to observed CEERS galaxies at 3 < z < 5. We find that our models correctly classify ∼60%-70% of simulated merging and nonmerging galaxies; better performance on the merger class comes at the expense of misclassifying more nonmergers. We could achieve more accurate classifications, as well as test for a dependency on physical parameters such as gas fraction, mass ratio, and relative orbits, by curating larger training sets. When applied to real CEERS galaxies using visual classifications as ground truth, the random forests correctly classified 40%-60% of mergers and nonmergers at 3 < z < 4 but tended to classify most objects as nonmergers at 4 < z < 5 (misclassifying ∼70% of visually classified mergers). On the other hand, the CNNs tended to classify most objects as mergers across all redshifts (misclassifying 80%-90% of visually classified nonmergers). We investigate what features the models find most useful, as well as the characteristics of false positives and false negatives, and also calculate merger rates derived from the identifications made by the models.

Abstract Copyright: © 2024. The Author(s). Published by the American Astronomical Society.

Journal keyword(s): James Webb Space Telescope - Galaxy mergers - Astronomical simulations - Random Forests - Convolutional neural networks

Simbad objects: 1

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 1
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2026
#notes
1 NAME Extended Groth Strip reg 14 19 +52.8           ~ 1023 0

Query : 2024ApJ...976L...8R

Basic data :
NAME Extended Groth Strip -- Region defined in the Sky
Other object types:
otypes_help
reg ()
ICRS coord. (ep=J2000) :
14 19 00.0 +52 48 00 [ ] E ~
FK4 coord. (ep=B1950 eq=1950) :
14 17 16.3 +53 01 45 [ ]
Gal coord. (ep=J2000) :
096.4814 +59.5977 [ ]
SIMBAD within arcmin
Overlay Simbad points in this preview
Back
All CDSPortal (CDSPortal)

Send to sendBySAMP sendBySAMP

sedIcon
within arcsec sed-help-icon

Identifiers (2) :
An access of full data is available using the icon Vizier near the identifier of the catalogue

NAME EGS NAME Extended Groth Strip

References (1023 between 1850 and 2026) (Total 1023)
Simbad bibliographic survey began in 1850 for stars (at least bright stars) and in 1983 for all other objects (outside the solar system).
Follow new references on this object
                Reference summaries :

                from: to:

                 or select by : (not exhaustive, explanation here)


Observing logs

Herschel : 31   

   


Annotations :
Annotations allow a user to add a note or report an error concerning the astronomical object and its data. It requires registration to post a note. See description .
Please, have a look at Best practices. The list of all annotations to SIMBAD objects can be found here .

The annotation server is currently not available. Sorry for any inconvenience


To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2024ApJ...976L...8R and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu