2025MNRAS.542.1109S


Query : 2025MNRAS.542.1109S

2025MNRAS.542.1109S - Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 542, 1109-1124 (2025/September-2)

Auriga Streams II: orbital properties of tidally disrupting satellites of Milky Way-mass galaxies.

SHIPP N., RILEY A.H., SIMPSON C.M., BIERI R., NECIB L., ARORA A., FRAGKOUDI F., GOMEZ F.A., GRAND R.J.J. and MARINACCI F.

Abstract (from CDS):

Galaxies like the Milky Way are surrounded by complex populations of satellites at all stages of tidal disruption. In this paper, we present a dynamical study of the disrupting satellite galaxies in the Auriga simulations that are orbiting 28 distinct Milky Way-mass hosts across three resolutions. We find that the satellite galaxy populations are highly disrupted. The majority of satellites that remain fully intact at present day were accreted recently without experiencing more than one pericentre ($n_{\rm peri} \lesssim 1$) and have large apocentres ($r_{\rm apo} \gtrsim 200 \mathrm{\, kpc}$) and pericentres ($r_{\rm peri} \gtrsim 50 \mathrm{\, kpc}$). The remaining satellites have experienced significant tidal disruption and, given full knowledge of the system, would be classified as stellar streams. We find stellar streams in Auriga across the range of pericentres and apocentres of the known Milky Way dwarf galaxy streams and, interestingly, overlapping significantly with the Milky Way intact satellite population. We find no significant change in satellite orbital distributions across resolution. However, we do see substantial halo-to-halo variance of $(r_\text{peri}, r_\text{apo})$ distributions across host galaxies, as well as a dependence of satellite orbits on host halo mass-systems disrupt at larger pericentres and apocentres in more massive hosts. Our results suggest that either cosmological simulations (including, but not limited to, Auriga) are disrupting satellites far too readily, or that the Milky Way's satellites are more disrupted than current imaging surveys have revealed. Future observing facilities and careful mock observations of these systems will be key to revealing the nature of this apparent discrepancy.

Abstract Copyright: © The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal Astronomical Society.

Journal keyword(s): methods: numerical - Galaxy: halo - Galaxy: kinematics and dynamics - Galaxy: structure

Simbad objects: 7

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 7
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2026
#notes
1 M 31 AGN 00 42 44.330 +41 16 07.50 4.86 4.36 3.44     ~ 13622 1
2 NAME LMC G 05 23 34.6 -69 45 22     0.4     ~ 19090 0
3 NAME Antlia II Dwarf Galaxy G 09 35 32.8 -36 46 02           ~ 109 0
4 NAME Crater II Dwarf Galaxy G 11 49 14 -18 24.8           ~ 176 0
5 NAME SDG G 18 55 19.0 -30 32 43   4.5 3.6     ~ 2438 2
6 NAME Tuc III G 23 56.6 -59 36           ~ 229 0
7 NAME Gaia Enceladus-Sausage St* ~ ~           ~ 860 0

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2025MNRAS.542.1109S and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu