2026A&A...705A.150H


Query : 2026A&A...705A.150H

2026A&A...705A.150H - Astronomy and Astrophysics, volume 705A150 (2026/1-1)

TDCOSMO XXII. Triaxiality and projection effects in time-delay cosmography.

HUANG X.-Y., BIRRER S., CAPPELLARI M., TREU T., KNABEL S. and SLUSE D.

Abstract (from CDS):

Context. Constraining the mass-sheet degeneracy (MSD) is crucial for improving the precision and accuracy of time-delay cosmography. Joint analyses based on lensing and stellar kinematics have been widely adopted to break the MSD. A three-dimensional (3D) mass and stellar tracer population is required to accurately interpret the kinematics data.
Aims. Our forward-modeling procedure is aimed at evaluating the projection effects using strong lensing and kinematics observables and to determine an optimal model assumption for the stellar kinematics analysis leading to an unbiased interpretation of the MSD and H0.
Methods. We numerically simulated the projection and selection effects for both a triaxial early-type galaxy (ETG) sample from the TNG100 simulation and an axisymmetric sample that matches the properties of slow-rotator galaxies representative of the strong lens galaxy population. Using the axisymmetric sample, we generated mock kinematics observables with spherically aligned axisymmetric Jeans anisotropic modeling (JAM) and assessed the kinematic recovery under different model assumptions. Using the triaxial sample, we quantified the random uncertainty introduced by modeling triaxial galaxies with axisymmetric JAM.
Results. We show that spherical JAM analysis of spatially unresolved kinematic data introduces a bias of up to 2-4% (depending on the intrinsic shape of the lens) in the inferred MSD. Our model largely corrects this bias, resulting in a residual random uncertainty in the range of 0-2.2% in the stellar velocity dispersion (0-4.4% in H0), depending on the projected ellipticity and the anisotropy of the stellar orbits. This residual uncertainty can be further mitigated by the use of spatially resolved kinematic data, which constrain the intrinsic axis ratio. We also show that the random uncertainty in the kinematics recovery using axisymmetric JAM for axisymmetric galaxies is at the level of 0.24% in the velocity dispersion, and the uncertainty using axisymmetric JAM for triaxial galaxies is at the level of 0.17% in the velocity dispersion.

Abstract Copyright: © The Authors 2026

Journal keyword(s): gravitational lensing: strong - galaxies: kinematics and dynamics - distance scale

Simbad objects: 14

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 14
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2026
#notes
1 SLACS SDSS J0029-0055 gLS 00 29 07.7777644104 -00 55 50.581964100           ~ 31 0
2 SLACS SDSS J0037-0942 gLS 00 37 53.2145165976 -09 42 20.158898652           ~ 37 0
3 SLACS SDSS J0330-0020 gLS 03 30 12.134 -00 20 51.88           ~ 30 0
4 SLACS SDSS J1112+0826 gLS 11 12 50.5973077920 +08 26 10.390761636           ~ 26 0
5 SLACS SDSS J1204+0358 gLS 12 04 44.070 +03 58 06.40           ~ 30 0
6 SLACS SDSS J1250+0523 gLS 12 50 28.2624714720 +05 23 49.075233504           ~ 35 0
7 SLACS SDSS J1306+0600 gLS 13 06 13 +06 00.4           ~ 13 0
8 SLACS SDSS J1402+6321 gLS 14 02 28.2190035864 +63 21 33.299741304           ~ 37 0
9 SLACS SDSS J1531-0105 gLS 15 31 50.0734316016 -01 05 45.731314896           ~ 26 0
10 SLACS SDSS J1538+5817 gLS 15 38 12.933 +58 17 09.60           ~ 26 0
11 SLACS SDSS J1621+3931 gLS 16 21 32.9890412808 +39 31 44.656966560           ~ 24 0
12 SLACS SDSS J1627-0053 gLS 16 27 46.4442031920 -00 53 57.542699832           ~ 40 0
13 SLACS SDSS J1630+4520 gLS 16 30 28.1580942120 +45 20 36.241137780           ~ 36 0
14 SLACS SDSS J2303+1422 gLS 23 03 21.7279540536 +14 22 17.928240960           ~ 36 0

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2026A&A...705A.150H and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu