2026ApJ...998..123T


Query : 2026ApJ...998..123T

2026ApJ...998..123T - Astrophys. J., 998, 123 (2026/February-2)

SN 2022acko and the Properties of Its Red Supergiant Progenitor: Direct Detection, Light Curves, and Nebular Spectroscopy.

TEIXEIRA G., KILPATRICK C.D., BOM C.R., SANTOS A., DARC P., AUCHETTL K., ALVAREZ-CANDAL A., FOLEY R.J., HUMIRE P.K., PIRO A.L., ROJAS-BRAVO C., MENDES DE OLIVEIRA C., KANAAN A., RIBEIRO T. and SCHOENELL W.

Abstract (from CDS):

We present ultraviolet, optical, and infrared observations of the Type II-P supernova SN 2022acko in NGC 1300, located at a distance of 19.0 ± 2.9 Mpc. Our dataset spans 1-350 day postexplosion in photometry, complemented by late-time optical spectroscopy covering 200-600 days, and includes deep preexplosion imaging. We use this extensive multiwavelength dataset for both direct and indirect constraints on the progenitor system. Using the early time photometry and shock cooling models, we infer that SN 2022acko likely originated from a red supergiant with a radius of R ∼ 580 R⊙ and an initial mass of M ∼ 9-10 M⊙. From the radioactive decay tail, we infer a synthesized 56Ni mass of 0.014 ± 0.004 M⊙. We further model nebular-phase spectra using radiative transfer models and nucleosynthesis yields for core-collapse supernovae, which suggest a progenitor initial mass in the range of 10-15 M⊙. Meanwhile, a blackbody fitting of the detected preexplosion counterpart in the F814W and F160W bands indicates a red supergiant with a lower initial mass of approximately 7.5 M⊙. The light curve exhibits a 116 day plateau, indicative of a massive hydrogen-rich envelope, inconsistent with the preexplosion analysis. We investigated the discrepancy between direct and indirect progenitor mass estimates, focusing on the roles of binary interaction, early time modeling limitations, and systematic uncertainties in spectral calibration. Our results indicate that there may be tension among mass estimates, potentially arising from modeling limitations and flux calibration uncertainties rather than from insufficient data and highlighting the need for more physically realistic models and a deeper understanding of systematic effects.

Abstract Copyright: © 2026. The Author(s). Published by the American Astronomical Society.

Journal keyword(s): Type II supernovae - Spectroscopy - Light curves - Red supergiant stars - Astronomy data modeling

Status at CDS : Large table(s) will be appraised for possible ingestion in VizieR.

Simbad objects: 10

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 10
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2026
#notes
1 SN 2022acko SN* 03 19 38.990 -19 23 42.68           SNIIP 28 0
2 NGC 1300 Sy2 03 19 41.0462219928 -19 24 40.187565432   11.16 10.42 9.90 10.7 ~ 616 0
3 SN 2021yja SN* 03 24 21.180 -21 33 56.20           SNIIP 39 0
4 SN 2023axu SN* 06 45 55.320 -18 13 53.52           SNII 5 0
5 SN 2022jox SN* 09 57 44.520 -28 30 57.06           SNII 11 0
6 SN 2009md SN* 10 48 26.28 +12 32 02.8           SNIIP 75 2
7 SN 2020jfo SN* 12 21 50.480 +04 28 54.05           SNII 48 0
8 SN 2008in SN* 12 22 01.77 +04 28 47.5           SNIIP 117 1
9 SN 2023ixf SN* 14 03 38.562 +54 18 41.94           SNII 209 0
10 BD+28 4211 HS* 21 51 11.0221915656 +28 51 50.367627468 8.922 10.25 10.58 10.656 10.831 sdO2VIIIHe5 837 0

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2026ApJ...998..123T and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu